Hi, I got a PM by a user confused about the source of my recent tracings of orchard, which used the default Bing imagery. I do not intend to imply that Potlatch ever did it before (bad choice of words?). It would help though if it did! :-)
— ika-chan! > On 8 May 2017, at 19:28, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > > ika-chan! (OpenStreetMap) wrote: >> I have found a potentially serious flaw in Potlatch 2 where it does not >> record >> the imagery used (e.g. Bing, MapBox) when saving changesets. > > Er, I'm not sure why you think you've "found" this. No-one has ever claimed > that P2 writes an imagery_used tag. iD does, Vespucci does. I don't think > JOSM does but may be wrong. Editors do different things. I don't believe > anyone has ever even asked for P2 to write imagery_used, though I may be > wrong. > >> This is leading to serious confusion as a result. > > [citation needed]? > > Richard > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Possible-flaw-Potlatch-2-not-recognising-source-tp5896441p5896445.html > Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
