I'm working on a script to do some pre-rendering of a Mapnik-based tile
layer. Conventional meta-tile sizes would be 4x4 or 8x8, but these are
selected to balance latency and throughput or efficiency. I'm using
mapproxy, which stores the tiles as individual files on-disk, not
mod_tile, which stores metatiles. This means that I can easily change
meta-tile size, and I don't even have to worry about differing latency
from slicing PNGs.
Latency does not matter with a pre-render task, so I've been considering
using extra-large metatiles. Has anyone tried this before?
Based on experience from metatiles 1-8 tiles across, as size increases I
expect query time and time to render to increase, but time per tile to
decrease. I don't know at what point this stops being true.
I believe Mapnik has problems with very large images, but I'm not sure
when that happens. I think at least 16k px wide is doable.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
