On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:28:38 +0200 Michael Reichert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just to ensure that all important test conditions are known. > > Do you mean the weekly changesets dump from > https://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet/changesets-latest.osm.bz2? Or > how did you create changes.osc or where did you download it from? > changesets-latest.osm.bz contains changeset metadata only. changes.osc was created via osmosis. 0.92 was running w/ a max interval of 7 days. 0.96 was running w/ a max interval of 1 day. For reference, this is the command used to create the changeset: osmosis --read-replication-interval workingDirectory=$WORKDIR_OSM --simplify-change --write-xml-change changes.osc.gz Replication url from osmosis configuration.txt: https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/day/ > The tests were done with Europe only which is roughly 2/3 of the whole > planet. I did not realize Europe accounted for such a large portion of the OSM data! I did notice that your test reported a 10GB memory usage for the import. I did not pay attention to the memory usage for 0.92 imports, but tile expiration seems to be requiring significant memory as of 0.96. My own test hit 22GB before I ^C'd. 21GB more than required w/o expiration. > I will have a deeper look into this but my test machine is currently > busy doing other work. My own dev box is very busy for the next couple of weeks, but I can spin something up for testing purposes if needed. j _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
