Fair enough, I thought ofpbuf_at was the more canonical way to do it. I'll back out that change and simply remove the final assignment.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > It's fine to remove the final assignment, since obviously it's not > used. It's unnecessary to use ofpbuf_at() earlier, though, since > ofputil_decode_msg_type() already verified for us that the > ofp_stats_reply is present. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
