On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:09:38PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> The bonding code only needs to know whether a given slave may be >> enabled, and whether LACP has been negotiated on the bond. Instead >> of passing in the LACP handle and letting the bond query this >> information. This patch passes in the information directly. > > Looks good. > > I wonder whether we should print the lacp_negotiated and > lacp_may_enable status in the unixctl output.
Eh can't hurt. I'll add it. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
