I'm happy to see it merged without re-posting.  Thanks!

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:22:12AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Yep, I'll merge them all in series. Right now actually unless you want
> to see some incrementals.
> 
> Ethan
> 
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:06:35AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> >> --- a/vswitchd/bridge.c
> >> +++ b/vswitchd/bridge.c
> >> @@ -3021,6 +3021,7 @@ port_destroy(struct port *port)
> >>
> >> ? ? ? ? ?VLOG_INFO("destroyed port %s on bridge %s", port->name, br->name);
> >>
> >> + ? ? ? ?bond_destroy(port->bond);
> >> ? ? ? ? ?lacp_destroy(port->lacp);
> >> ? ? ? ? ?port_flush_macs(port);
> >
> > Looks good, thanks.
> >
> > I guess you applied this after after your lacp refactoring series
> > since the lacp_destroy() call is in there.
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to