On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:39, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Doesn't check_output_port() reject OFPP_NONE at flow validation time?
> (I remember talking to you about this, but not the conclusion.)
Yah it does, but the bundle_execute() function in a future patch
returns OFPP_NONE if all the links are down.
Ethan
>
> I don't see any harm in doing this, though.
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> This provides a minor optimization.
>> ---
>> ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 2 ++
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
>> index 7264355..4d9d5da 100644
>> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
>> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
>> @@ -2935,6 +2935,8 @@ xlate_output_action__(struct action_xlate_ctx *ctx,
>> case OFPP_LOCAL:
>> add_output_action(ctx, OFPP_LOCAL);
>> break;
>> + case OFPP_NONE:
>> + break;
>> default:
>> if (port != ctx->flow.in_port) {
>> add_output_action(ctx, port);
>> --
>> 1.7.6
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
