I'm just as happy not to package it if its not going to make it upstream. But I don't feel strongly about this.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:26:58AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I don't really want people using brcompat if they can avoid it. Its > prospects for upstreaming are nil. But I guess that we might as well > package it as long as it's around anyway. > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:42:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > This change seems reasonable to me, although for some reason I was > > under the impression that brcompat was deprecated. > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:37:20AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > Simon, I wouldn't mind getting your input on this change, if you have > > > some time to look at it. I should have CC'd you originally on it. > > > > > > I assume you're on [email protected] and already have the actual > > > patch, otherwise it's here: > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2011-July/009879.html > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:12:34PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > This adds support for bridge compatibility to the generic Open vSwitch > > > > init scripts and to the Debian packaging. > > > > > > > > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/808224. > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
