On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > Until now this has just silently failed, but it seems to me like we should > actively reject it. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
This makes sense but it seems to me that there are plenty of other things that fall into the category of invalid but silently ignored. With vports, there are conflicting names and port numbers, something similar for datapaths, and everywhere things like stats that shouldn't be set. I think this one is probably the worst and it's a step in the right direction so: Acked-by: Jesse Gross <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
