Maybe. The rest are much simpler, though, and I haven't had trouble with them in practice the way I have had with "learn".
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:52:53PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Does it make sense to do something like this for the other complex > actions we have (bundle, autopath, multipath, etc)? > > Ethan > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 13:36, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > learn_parse() and learn_check() are supposed to apply the same checks, but > > they are implemented very differently. ?It seems best to have learn_parse() > > actually call learn_check() just to be sure. > > > > This would have caught the bug fixed in the previous commit, because > > the tests actually contain instances of "learn" actions that trigger the > > bug, but the tests only parsed the actions without ever doing anything > > that checked them (like sending them to ovs-vswitchd over OpenFlow). _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
