On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Add tunnel tundevs for tunnel realdevs as needed.
> 
> In general the notion is that realdevs may be configured by users
> and from an end-user point of view are compatible with the existing
> port-based tunneling code. And that tundevs exist in the datapath
> arnd are actually used to send and recieve packets, based on flows.
> 
> Cc: Kyle Mestery <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

This seems reasonable at a glance.  There are bits I might quibble
with as this gets closer, but the structure seems reasonable.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to