On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:31:14AM -0800, Alex Wang wrote: > LGTM, one comment below, > > > > > - if ((dpif->epoll_fd >= 0) == enable) { > > - return 0; > > - } > > - > > - if (!enable) { > > - destroy_channels(dpif); > > - } else { > > - struct dpif_port_dump port_dump; > > - struct dpif_port port; > > - > > + /* To start with, we need an epoll fd. */ > > + if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) { > > + dpif->epoll_fd = epoll_create(10); > > if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) { > > dpif->epoll_fd = epoll_create(10); > > if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) { > > return errno; > > } > > } > > + } > > > > > Do we need two "if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0)" ?
We need two checks, but we don't need two calls to epoll_create()! I changed this to: /* To start with, we need an epoll fd. */ if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) { dpif->epoll_fd = epoll_create(10); if (dpif->epoll_fd < 0) { return errno; } } Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev