On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler. > > "a simpler" => "simpler"? > "a simpler" => "possible"? ;-) > > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> > > I think that, under the new locking rules, dpif_netdev_flow_get() and > dpif_netdev_flow_dump_next() could skip taking dp->cls.rwlock.
Oh, I forgot: Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
