On Sep 19, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Samuel Ghinet <sghi...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Nithin, > > Thanks for the clarifications on the Tcp segmentation and NBs sharing info. I > had missed that detail :) > I will use the flow from the first NBL for all the NBLs that resulted from > tcp segmentation. > > Yes you're right: since OvsProcessOneNb is wrapped within a rw lock and > unlock, we are certainly at dispatch level, because of the lock. > In this case, I will leave the ASSERT in OvsProcessOneNb - for the possible > case in the future, where the caller code might change - and remove the > atDispatch from OvsProcessOneNb. > > I'll send a new version of the patch after I've worked a bit more on the > netlink vport commands :) Great! Look forward to reviewing the v2 patch. -- Nithin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
