Hi Nithin,

I agree with you. We can drop this patch then.

Sorin

-----Original Message-----
From: Nithin Raju [mailto:nit...@vmware.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 14 May, 2015 18:24
To: Sorin Vinturis
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 5/5] datapath-windows: Multiple NBLs support for 
VXLAN packets

> On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Sorin Vinturis 
> <svintu...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote:
> 
> Added support for handling multiple NBLs with only one NB when 
> encapsulating VXLAN packets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sorin Vinturis <svintu...@cloudbasesolutions.com>

hi Sorin,
Was this patch necessary? 

Here’s my reasoning for the question. If a NBL contains an NB that cannot fit 
within an MTU, then the packet gets chopped up into multiple packets and the 
encap header added to it. If the original NBL needed to be chopped up due to 
software TSO, then they’d be put into multiple NBs but within the same NBL. The 
reason we don’t need to create multiple NBLs is that, all the NBs would 
evaluate to the same flow key. There’s no need to split them into multiple NBLs 
and process them one at a time.

Pls. let me know if you disagree with this.

thanks,
-- Nithin
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to