On 04/08/2015 02:38, "Joe Stringer" <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote:

>On 30 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniele Di Proietto <diproiet...@vmware.com>
>wrote:
>> Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto <diproiet...@vmware.com>
>>
>> On 30/07/2015 00:52, "Joe Stringer" <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The initial sanity test only checked IPv4 without IP fragments. This
>>>patch
>>>adds additional tests using IPv6 and VLANs with IP fragments and expands
>>>the existing test to be more strict.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
>>>CC: Daniele Di Proietto <diproiet...@vmware.com>
>>>---
>>>
>>>Daniele, these tests are basic sanity checks to ensure that the tree
>>>works correctly today in particular when we start getting things like IP
>>>fragments and VLANs involved. For each of these tests, I also have some
>>>forthcoming tests that test the same environments but with
>>>conntrack/firewall flows. Would you mind looking at how we can make
>>>these tests generic across both datapaths, just like the other tests you
>>>have in your conntrack branch? It might be worthwhile to start
>>>upstreaming those changes, too.
>>
>> It doesn't appear too complicated to port these tests to the userspace
>> datapath (they actually do not require any change at all).
>> I have some patches almost ready on top of this series to do that.
>> I'll post them tomorrow, hoping that this gets merged
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>Apologies for the delay, I pushed this patch to master. The other
>patches will need some further attention before they are pushed.

Thanks, I've posted my series on top of current master.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to