On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:20:26PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Define a new inline function to map conntrack status to enum
> ip_conntrack_info. This removes the need to otherwise duplicate this
> code in a later patch.
Where is that later patch that justifies this update?
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
> ---
> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 22 +++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> index fde4068..b3de10e 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,21 @@ nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(const struct
> nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *hash)
> tuplehash[hash->tuple.dst.dir]);
> }
>
> +static inline enum ip_conntrack_info
> +nf_ct_get_info(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h)
> +{
> + const struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> +
> + if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
> + return IP_CT_ESTABLISHED_REPLY;
> + /* Once we've had two way comms, always ESTABLISHED. */
> + if (test_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status))
> + return IP_CT_ESTABLISHED;
> + if (test_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status))
> + return IP_CT_RELATED;
> + return IP_CT_NEW;
> +}
I would really like to see how you want to use this.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
