Hello,
Is it possible to merge this patch? It is quite simple, and very important for
integration with DPDK 2.2.
Br,
Michal.
-----Original Message-----
From: Weglicki, MichalX
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 7:30 AM
To: dev@openvswitch.org
Cc: Weglicki, MichalX <michalx.wegli...@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] netdev_dpdk: pci_dev pointer check.
This change prevents netdev_dpdk from accessing pointer
which is not valid.
Signed-off-by: Michal Weglicki <michalx.wegli...@intel.com>
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index 4658416..2831a1b 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
@@ -1690,8 +1690,12 @@ netdev_dpdk_get_status(const struct netdev *netdev_,
struct smap *args)
smap_add_format(args, "max_vfs", "%u", dev_info.max_vfs);
smap_add_format(args, "max_vmdq_pools", "%u", dev_info.max_vmdq_pools);
- smap_add_format(args, "pci-vendor_id", "0x%u",
dev_info.pci_dev->id.vendor_id);
- smap_add_format(args, "pci-device_id", "0x%x",
dev_info.pci_dev->id.device_id);
+ if (dev_info.pci_dev) {
+ smap_add_format(args, "pci-vendor_id", "0x%u",
+ dev_info.pci_dev->id.vendor_id);
+ smap_add_format(args, "pci-device_id", "0x%x",
+ dev_info.pci_dev->id.device_id);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
1.9.3
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
