I was hoping to keep the options column for options that are specific to a particular type of logical port. Do you think that the QoS options will be type specific or generic?
On December 30, 2015 3:51:13 AM CST, Babu Shanmugam <bscha...@redhat.com> wrote: >I am trying to implement the QOS APIs of openstack neutron in the >networking-ovn plugin. I understand that I have to make the relevant >changes in OVN code as well. > >I feel, 'options' field in Logical_Port table would be a decent >candidate to bring QoS support in OVN [1]. I could see from the >description that there are no 'options' mentioned for a VIF. Is there >any other way we could implement it through the northbound database? > >[1]. >Sample options - qos_(ingress | egress)_rate, qos_(ingress | >egress)_burst, qos_dscp. > > >-- >Babu _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev