Hi Ben, Sure, I will test this fix.
Regards, William On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > Thanks. Would you mind testing this proposed fix? > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-January/064070.html > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:32:48AM -0800, William Tu wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > These two tests generate the leak: > > mpls_xlate > > 381: MPLS xlate action > > ofproto-dpif > > 852: ofproto-dpif - MPLS handling > > > > ==65139== by 0x4E1C83: xmemdup (util.c:134) > > ==65139== by 0x431044: recirc_state_clone (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:221) > > ==65139== by 0x431044: recirc_alloc_id__ (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:238) > > ==65139== by 0x4315B8: recirc_alloc_id_ctx (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:281) > > ==65139== by 0x437C96: compose_recirculate_action__ > > (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:3643) > > ==65139== by 0x44095A: compose_recirculate_action > > (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:3664) > > ==65139== by 0x44095A: xlate_actions (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:5324) > > > > Regards, > > William > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > > I think that recirc_run needs to be modified so that > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:40:23PM +0000, ChengChun Tu wrote: > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > Yes, Valgrind testcase 381 reports leak and generates the call stack > > > below: > > > > I tried to debug it for a while but not able to understand it. > > > > > > Thanks, what's the name of that test case? The one I see as 381 > doesn't > > > seem relevant. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dev mailing list > > > dev@openvswitch.org > > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev