There's a lot of work happening to improve ovsdb performance (both on the client and server sides). There's testing happening in multiple environments (physical and simulated) in the hundreds-of-hypervisors range. Interestingly, most of the bottlenecks we're exposing are on the client side.
We have some docs about the current HA story with OpenStack here: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-ovn/faq.html Ben has mentioned that he might pick up the distributed ovsdb-server work, which is important to get a much better HA story (or I suspect we'll have to replace ovsdb). I'll let him comment further on intentions and status, though. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <dm...@cornell.edu> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > What's the current thinking around the OVSDB HA and scale solution? > Needless to say, the single SB DB to which all ovn-controllers connect > could be a liability in various production scenarios. > > Cheers, > Dan > On Mar 4, 2016 00:48, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > Here's my OVN report for the week, since I'll be in a meeting during the > > IRC session today. > > > > The "continuation" feature needed as a basis for others is in. Justin > > is reviewing the ARP support patches. > > > > I've spent most of the week in meetings, so there's been minimal > > progress. I'm currently working on some debugging support patches. > > After that, I'm going to work on OVSDB. I'm also interested in > > improving ovn-controller performance. > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > dev@openvswitch.org > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev