> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:38 PM > To: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com>; Shad Ansari <shad.an...@hpe.com> > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, v9, 02/10] Present tracked changes in > increasing > change number order > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:06:17PM -0600, Ryan Moats wrote: > > From: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > > > Currently changes are added to the front of the track list, so > > they are looped through in LIFO order. Incremental processing > > is more efficient with a FIFO presentation, so > > (1) add new changes to the back of the track list, and > > (2) move updated changes to the back of the track list > > > > Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > I applied this because it makes a lot of sense to me: it causes changes > to be presented in their natural order, that is, in the order in which > they were received. I'm copying Shad, the original author of the column > tracking code, on this message in case he wants to advocate that the > previous order was superior. > > Thanks, >
Makes sense. Thanks. Acked-by: Shad Ansari <shad.ans...@hpe.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
