On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ramu > > High level comment earlier that still applies: > > 1) garp reply is still being used rather than garp request > garp replies are more likely to be dropped or explicitly filtered so garp > requests are "better" > > Do you need to make changes to build_lswitch_flows() to allow the garp > requests out the localnet > ports ?
Darrell, Thanks, In the next version, I will update the code to send garp requests. garp requests are responded-to by the ARP responder flows. This interferes with sending garps using the packet out destination OFPP_TABLE which injects the packet into the ingress pipeline. So a change in needed the arp-responder flows to not respond to garps. Alternatively, I can change the packet out destination to directly output garps onto the localnet ofport. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
