On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 10:37, pravin shelar <pshe...@ovn.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 03:58:33PM -0700, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>>>> The neighbor entry expiry is only checked in dpif-poll
>>>> event handler, But in absence of any event we could keep
>>>> using arp entry forever. This patch changes it to check
>>>> expiration on each lookup.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org>
>>>
>>> I guess an alternative would be to introduce a "wait" function to make
>>> sure that expiration happens more expeditiously, but this seems fine
>>> too.
>>>
>>> The locking in this module seems a little heavy-handed given that we're
>>> using a cmap.
>>>
>> I am not sure if arp lookup locking is a bottleneck at this point but
>> I am planing on benchmarking tunnel performance. it can be addressed
>> then.
>>
>>> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
>>
>> Thanks. I pushed it to master.
>
> Do you think that this patch might cause reordering of the output of
> ovs-appctl tnl/arp/show ?
>
> https://travis-ci.org/openvswitch/ovs/jobs/129264117#L7455

I am not sure why would it cause reordering. I do not see this issue
on my test setup, anyways I have sent out patch to fix this issue.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to