The pull request seems OK to me.  Justin, do you have an opinion on this
patch?

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0800, nickcooper-zhangtonghao wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>       Thank you for your advice. In general case, we run an ovs-vtep process 
> on the hypervisor. 
> In our network virtualization solution, we want to run multiple copies of the 
> vtep simulator - ovs-vtep for the different network, 
> such as the data/management/storage network.
> 
> Start the VTEP emulator:
>       ovs-vtep --detach mgmt-network
>       ovs-vtep --detach stor-network
>       ovs-vtep --detach data-network
> 
> Bind the logical switch to a port:
>       vtep-ctl bind-ls mgmt-network vnet0 0 ls0
>       vtep-ctl bind-ls stor-network vnet1 0 ls1
>       vtep-ctl bind-ls data-network vnet2 0 ls2
> 
> 
> In fact, the vnet0/vnet1/vnet2 have been connected to the “vtep_ls1” bridge. 
> So, the VMs of the different physical switches have been connected. 
> This is arguably an ovs-vtep bug. I fixed this bug by including the physical 
> switch name as part of the logical switch name.  
> Darrell Ball did an initial test using the OVN gateway test case and did not 
> see any issues with the proposed diff.
> I have submited a pull request. https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/pull/126 
> <https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/pull/126>
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> nickcooper-zhangtonghao.
> 
> 
> > On May 18, 2016, at 10:26 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:44:26PM +0800, nickcooper-zhangtonghao wrote:
> >> signed-off-by: nickcooper-zhangtong...@opencloud.tech 
> >> <mailto:nickcooper-zhangtong...@opencloud.tech>
> >> 
> >> The computer can run multiple ovs-vtep processes, but ovs-vtep processes 
> >> share the “vtep_lsX” bridge when binding the physical-switch and 
> >> logical-switch. The bridge created by logical-switch should be named  
> >> according to logical-switch.
> > 
> > Hi Nick, thanks for submitting a patch.
> > 
> > You'll need to resubmit it for a number of reasons.
> > 
> > Your return email address was totally wrong and definitely not usable.
> > I think I've corrected it; we'll see if my reply bounces.
> > 
> > Please use a short (<75 character) title.
> > 
> > Please limit lines in the commit message to 75 characters or so.
> > 
> > "Signed-off-by" goes at the end of the message and it should be
> > formatted as:
> >        Signed-off-by: Your Real Name <email@host>
> > not as you did it.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Ben.
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to