CC: mail-list.
Sorry.

On 23.05.2016 10:49, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Hi, Ryan.
> This patch currently conflicts with patch-set 'Reconfigure netdev at
> runtime' from Daniele Di Proietto
> ( http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-April/070064.html ),
> which, I think, is more important to apply now.
> We will think about future of this change later.
> 
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 
> P.S. It would be nice to add involved people to CC-list while sending
> emails. Replying to original message also would be a good idea. Thanks.
> 
> 
> On 09.05.2016 20:31, Ryan Moats wrote:
>> "dev" <dev-bounces at openvswitch.org> wrote on 02/24/2016 12:47:34 PM
>>
>>> From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>
>>> X-Patchwork-Id: 587370
>>> Message-Id: <1456318054-4789-1-git-send-email-i.maximets at samsung.com>
>>> To: dev at openvswitch.org, Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod at vmware.com>
>>> Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>, Flavio Leitner
>> <fbl at sysclose.org>,
>>>  Joe Stringer <joestringer at nicira.com>, Dyasly Sergey
>> <s.dyasly at samsung.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:47:34 +0300
>>>
>>> Since 5f2ccb1c0d3b ("dpif: Allow adding ukeys for same flow by
>>> different pmds.") there is the possibility to reassign queues among
>>> pmd threads without restarting them and deleting the megaflow cache.
>>>
>>> So, reconfiguration can be performed without destroying of PMD threads
>>> if pmd-cpu-mask not changed.
>>>
>>> Reassignment of all rx queues done to achieve fair distribution.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets at samsung.com>
>>> Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl at sysclose.org>
>>> ---
>>
>> While looking back at the tail of the patch queue, I came across this
>> and I'm not sure what it's status is - the patch doesn't merge cleanly
>> now (part 2 fails) and so if it is still valid, can we get a rebase?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to