Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org> wrote on 06/14/2016 12:08:54 PM: > From: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: Johnson Li <johnson...@intel.com>, ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org> > Date: 06/14/2016 12:09 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] Add NSH fields for > Openvswitch flowkey > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 06/14/2016 11:34:50 AM: > > > >> From: Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org> > >> To: Johnson Li <johnson...@intel.com> > >> Cc: ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org> > >> Date: 06/14/2016 11:35 AM > >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/14] Add NSH fields for > >> Openvswitch flow key > >> Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Johnson Li <johnson...@intel.com> wrote: > >> > Openvswitch could use the fields of Network Serivce Header(NSH) > >> > as key to steer traffic to the Virtual Network Functions(VNF). > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Johnson Li <johnson...@intel.com> > >> > >> I only see patch 2/14. Are there supposed to be more? > > > > I took it to be a missing piece of the earlier patch set that had > > a cover letter and then appeared to start at patch 3/14. > > Ah, that's a good point, thanks. I didn't even consider that this > could have gotten stuck for a week. >
Since I had 2/3rds of my latest incremental processing patch series just "get lost" between the reflector and patchworks (and therefore require a resubmit of those patches), I'm more sensitive to the possibility now :) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
