"Wojciechowicz, RobertX" <robertx.wojciechow...@intel.com> writes:

> Hi Ben,
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 5:07 PM
>> To: Wojciechowicz, RobertX <robertx.wojciechow...@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovsdb: Expose vhost-user socket directory
>> in ovsdb
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:22:40AM +0000, Wojciechowicz, RobertX wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
>> > > Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 2:49 AM
>> > > To: Wojciechowicz, RobertX <robertx.wojciechow...@intel.com>
>> > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovsdb: Expose vhost-user socket
>> directory
>> > > in ovsdb
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:16:51AM +0000, Wojciechowicz, RobertX
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
>> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 10:41 PM
>> > > > > To: Wojciechowicz, RobertX <robertx.wojciechow...@intel.com>
>> > > > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovsdb: Expose vhost-user socket
>> > > directory
>> > > > > in ovsdb
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:25:56AM +0100, Robert Wojciechowicz
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > In order to correctly interoperate with Openstack and ODL,
>> > > > > > the vhost-user socket directory must be exposed from OVS via
>> OVSDB.
>> > > > > > Different distros may package OVS in different ways,
>> > > > > > so the locations of these sockets may vary depending on how
>> > > > > > ovs-vswitchd has been started. Some clients need information
>> where
>> > > > > > the sockets are located when instantiating Qemu virtual machines.
>> > > > > > The full vhost-user socket directory is constructed from current
>> > > > > > OVS working directory and optionally from specified subdirectory.
>> > > > > > This patch exposes vhost-user socket directory in Open_vSwitch
>> > > > > > table in other_config column in two following keys:
>> > > > > > 1. ovs-run-dir    - OVS working directory
>> > > > > > 2. vhost-sock-dir - subdirectory of ovs-run-dir (might be empty)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Wojciechowicz
>> > > <robertx.wojciechow...@intel.com>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > v1->v2
>> > > > > > - moving vswitch-idl.h dependency inside #ifdef block
>> > > > > > - sock_dir_subcomponent initialization with ""
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Same comment as v1: architecturally, ovs-vswitchd only reads
>> > > > > other-config columns, it never writes to them.  Please fix.
>> > > >
>> > > > If ovs-vswitchd cannot writes to other-config then the only place
>> > > > for writing default values to this column I can think of is vswitch
>> > > > startup script ovs-ctl.
>> > > > Basically I tested in my environment the below solution
>> > > > and it seems to solve our issue.
>> > > > Is it acceptable approach?
>> > >
>> > > It looks like you're trying to use other-config to report something,
>> > > instead of to configure something.  That's not what it's for.
>> >
>> > Actually I'm trying to add missing information to the OVSDB.
>> > By default ovs-vswitchd is already configured that vhost-user
>> > sockects are created in the rundir, but this information
>> > is not available in the OVSDB. Third-party scripts, which need
>> > this information are forced to take some guesses about this.
>> > Basically this approach is very similar to storing hostname
>> > in this patch:
>> > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-March/068511.html
>> 
>> There is a difference between external-ids and other-config.
>> other-config is to configure the switch.  That patch uses external-ids.
>
> [RW] Yes, of course, but my point is that the configuration
> currently looks as follows:
> 1. start ovsdb
> 2. vhost-sock-dir is not configured
> 3. start ovs-vswitchd
> 4. ovs-vswitchd in the function dpdk_init__ configures vhost-sock-dir
> from ovs_rundir() and sock_dir_subcomponent
> 5. vhost-sock-dir is now configured, but still there is no information
> in the ovsdb

I don't understand this flow.  Can you tell me what you mean by
vhost-sock-dir is configured but not configured?

> Now the question is how the third-party scripts can find out where actually
> vhost-user sockets are located?
>
> Br,
> Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to