Hi Joe, I agree that this check is kind of redundant. Please remove this line. Thank you~
William On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> wrote: > On 1 July 2016 at 09:45, William Tu <u9012...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We generally try to keep the testsuite independent of the underlying >> datapath. This patch removes the datapath-specific tests and macros. >> >> Tested-at: https://travis-ci.org/williamtu/ovs-travis/builds/141642065 >> Signed-off-by: William Tu <u9012...@gmail.com> > > Thanks for sending this out. > >> --- >> tests/system-kmod-macros.at | 7 ------- >> tests/system-traffic.at | 13 ++----------- >> tests/system-userspace-macros.at | 7 ------- >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/system-kmod-macros.at b/tests/system-kmod-macros.at >> index a3e4dd7..cee0510 100644 >> --- a/tests/system-kmod-macros.at >> +++ b/tests/system-kmod-macros.at >> @@ -66,10 +66,3 @@ m4_define([CHECK_CONNTRACK], >> on_exit 'ovstest test-netlink-conntrack flush' >> ] >> ) >> - >> -# CHECK_KERNEL_DP, CHECK_USER_DP >> -# >> -# Ignore the CHECK_USER_DP and execute the CHECK_KERNEL_DP >> -# >> -m4_define([CHECK_KERNEL_DP], [$1]) >> -m4_define([CHECK_USER_DP], []) >> diff --git a/tests/system-traffic.at b/tests/system-traffic.at >> index 252ed20..f8e7279 100644 >> --- a/tests/system-traffic.at >> +++ b/tests/system-traffic.at >> @@ -334,14 +334,12 @@ dnl SLOW_ACTION test1: check datapatch actions >> AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl del-flows br0]) >> AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl add-flows br0 flows.txt]) >> >> -CHECK_KERNEL_DP( >> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace system >> 'in_port(2),eth(src=e6:66:c1:11:11:11,dst=e6:66:c1:22:22:22),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.0.1,dst=192.168.0.2,proto=6,tos=4,ttl=128,frag=no),tcp(src=8,dst=9)'], >> [0], [stdout]) >> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace br0 >> "in_port=1,dl_type=0x800,dl_src=e6:66:c1:11:11:11,dl_dst=e6:66:c1:22:22:22,nw_src=192.168.0.1,nw_dst=192.168.0.2,nw_proto=6,tp_src=8,tp_dst=9"], >> [0], [stdout]) >> AT_CHECK([tail -3 stdout], [0], >> [Datapath actions: >> trunc(100),3,5,trunc(100),3,trunc(100),5,3,trunc(200),5,trunc(65535),3 >> This flow is handled by the userspace slow path because it: >> - Uses action(s) not supported by datapath. >> ]) >> -) >> >> dnl SLOW_ACTION test2: check actual packet truncate >> AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl del-flows br0]) >> @@ -458,14 +456,7 @@ dnl SLOW_ACTION test1: check datapatch actions >> AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl del-flows br0]) >> AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl add-flows br0 flows.txt]) >> >> -CHECK_KERNEL_DP( >> -AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace system >> 'in_port(5),eth(src=e6:66:c1:11:11:11,dst=e6:66:c1:22:22:22),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.0.1,dst=192.168.0.2,proto=17,tos=4,ttl=128,frag=no),udp(src=8,dst=9)'], >> [0], [stdout]) >> -AT_CHECK([tail -3 stdout], [0], >> -[Datapath actions: trunc(100),set(tunnel(dst=172.31.1.1,ttl=64,flags(df))),4 >> -This flow is handled by the userspace slow path because it: >> - - Uses action(s) not supported by datapath. >> -]) >> -) >> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace br0 >> "in_port=2,dl_type=0x800,dl_src=e6:66:c1:11:11:11,dl_dst=e6:66:c1:22:22:22,nw_src=192.168.0.1,nw_dst=192.168.0.2,nw_proto=17,udp_src=8,udp_dst=9"], >> [0], [stdout]) > > I don't see any benefit to re-adding this check just to see if > ovs-appctl ofproto/trace returns a zero exit code. We already test > that the actual truncation occurs to the correct length later in the > test, so I see no benefit to checking the specific translation here > (although it was good that you verified that this was sane during your > own testing). With your OK, I'll remove this line and apply the patch > to master. Does that make sense? > > Thanks, > Joe _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev