On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Liran Schour <lir...@il.ibm.com> wrote:
> "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 03/08/2016 09:09:48 AM: > > > From: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> > > To: dlu...@gmail.com, d...@openvswitch.com, b...@ovn.org > > Date: 03/08/2016 09:10 AM > > Subject: [ovs-dev] [patch_v3] ovn: Add datapaths of interest filtering. > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> > > > > This patch adds datapaths of interest support where only datapaths of > > local interest are monitored by the ovn-controller ovsdb client. The > > idea is to do a flood fill in ovn-controller of datapath associations > > calculated by northd. A new column is added to the SB database > > datapath_binding table - related_datapaths to facilitate this so all > > datapaths associations are known quickly in ovn-controller. This > > allows monitoring to adapt quickly with a single new monitor setting > > for all datapaths of interest locally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> > > --- > > > > I still think this work is mainly based on top of the conditional monitor > work. However it introduces a flood fill in the ovn-controller using the > new added column, related_datapaths, in the datapath_bindning table which > is important optimization to the origin work. > > Since the origin patch has went through 12 iterations and it is much more > stable and mature (http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-August/ > 077008.html). > I propose to combine the 2 patches. > > What do you think? I just got back from 5 days vacation yesterday. The patches are significantly different in design and implementation aspects. They both call some conditional monitoring APIs. However, I would like to find a way to share in some way. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
