From your second mail I figure I should base on your revert patch and post a v5 instead where cpvector is replaced by the old pvector again.
What is the best procedure for this? I guess I should wait until the revert patch is merged. But that might delay the review and reduce chances of making it for 2.6. Please advise. Thanks, Jan From: Jarno Rajahalme [mailto:ja...@ovn.org] Sent: Tuesday, 09 August, 2016 22:04 To: Jan Scheurich Cc: dev@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] dpif-netdev: dpcls per in_port with sorted subtables On Aug 9, 2016, at 7:08 AM, Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@web.de<mailto:jan.scheur...@web.de>> wrote: - Adapted to renamed cpvector API Reverted dplcs to using cpvector due to threading issue during flow removal Would you be kind and make this a separate patch, with a more detailed commit message. Thanks, Jarno _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
