Regards
_Sugesh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Gross [mailto:je...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 10:09 PM
> To: Chandran, Sugesh <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>
> Cc: ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv5] netdev-dpdk: Enable Rx checksum offloading
> feature on DPDK physical ports.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Sugesh Chandran
> <sugesh.chand...@intel.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index
> > 6d334db..46c4045 100644
> > --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> >  static void
> > +dpdk_eth_checksum_offload_configure(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
> > +    OVS_REQUIRES(dev->mutex)
> > +{
> > +    struct rte_eth_dev_info info;
> > +    bool rx_csum_ol_flag = false;
> > +    uint32_t rx_chksm_offload_capa = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> > +                                     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> > +                                     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM;
> > +    rte_eth_dev_info_get(dev->port_id, &info);
> > +    rx_csum_ol_flag = (dev->hw_ol_features &
> > +NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD) != 0;
> > +
> > +    if (rx_csum_ol_flag &&
> > +        (info.rx_offload_capa & rx_chksm_offload_capa) !=
> > +         rx_chksm_offload_capa) {
> > +        VLOG_WARN("Failed to enable Rx checksum offload on device %d",
> > +                   dev->port_id);
> > +        dev->hw_ol_features &= ~NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD;
> > +    }
> > +    netdev_request_reconfigure(&dev->up);
> > +}
> 
> Sorry :) I noticed one more thing.
[Sugesh] Not a problem Jesse :) .I feel we must return right after flag got 
cleared when the device
doesn’t support the rx checksum offloading. So that it avoid calling 
unnecessary reconfigure.
Does it make sense?
> 
> I think that if the device doesn't support checksum offload then we will
> continuously try to reconfigure the device, which I'm guessing is relatively
> expensive. I think this would happen every time that ovs-vswitchd wakes up.
> Are those assumptions correct? If so, that seems like a problem even if such
> devices are probably fairly rare to be used with DPDK.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to