+1 go for it.

The @Observes part of the spec is pretty obfuscated, and I remember a long 
discussion where still not all points are cleared.

Thus I think we should allow as much as possible without interfering the spec.

LieGrue,
strub

--- Joe Bergmark (JIRA) <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 22.2.2010:

> Von: Joe Bergmark (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> Betreff: [jira] Commented: (OWB-297) DelegateInjection point should not be 
> required to be an interface.
> An: [email protected]
> Datum: Montag, 22. Februar, 2010 21:13 Uhr
> 
>     [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836876#action_12836876
> ] 
> 
> Joe Bergmark commented on OWB-297:
> ----------------------------------
> 
> Removing the interface check from DecoratorUtil and
> WebBeansDecorator did not fail any of our unit tests, and
> passed one additional TCK test without any
> regressions.  Unless there is another interpretation of
> this behavior I will plan on committing this change.
> 
> > DelegateInjection point should not be required to be
> an interface.
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >             
>    Key: OWB-297
> >             
>    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-297
> >         
>    Project: OpenWebBeans
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components:
> Interceptor and Decorators
> >    Affects Versions: M3
> >            Reporter: Joe
> Bergmark
> >            Assignee: Joe
> Bergmark
> >         
>    Fix For: 1.0.0
> >
> >
> > Currently if the delegate injection point of an
> Decorator is not an interface a deployment time exception is
> thrown.  
> > This  behavior does not match my understanding of
> section 8.1.3 which I believe says that the type of the
> delegate injection point must extend or implement all of the
> decorated types.  I also believe this is leading to
> some TCK failures currently.
> 
> -- 
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
> online.
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to