gnnnn, I really hate our distribution project. This is unnecessary maintenance intense :(
Our distribution binary includes the release notes from alpha-2. Otherwise the release is fine and I'd give a +1. Do I need to redo our whole release now? wdyt? LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 9/30/10, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Subject: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.0.0 > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 11:01 PM > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache > OpenWebBeans-1.0.0 . > > Maven staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-001/ > > SVN source tag (1003328): > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0/ > > Source release: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-001/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.0.0/openwebbeans-1.0.0-source-release.zip > > Binary release: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-001/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.0.0-binary.tar.gz > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1 > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why) > > A small note: I've created a owb_1.0.x branch which will > contain the maintenance work on OWB-1.0.x. Feature > development will be performed in trunk which now has a > version of 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > >
