On Jan 9, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: >>>> I think we only have the ProcessProducerMethod/Field tests to worry about >>>> as >>>> far as tck compliance. > > I have corrected those errors in OWB side. > > For me, tomcat integration has passed TCK 1.0.4 CR2 with WebProfile.
This appears to work in geronimo also!!!! many thanks david jencks > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > Sent: Sat, January 8, 2011 10:13:02 PM > Subject: Re: Next steps with WebBeansContext? > > with rev 1056785 all the standalone tck tests are passing for me so I think > we > only have the ProcessProducerMethod/Field tests to worry about as far as tck > compliance. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jan 8, 2011, at 10:43 AM, David Jencks wrote: > >> I guess as a side effect of these changes in the last day when I run >> >> mvn clean install -Ptck >> >> locally I've gone from 23 to 1 failing test. I suspect something in the >> app >> environment wasn't getting cleaned up appropriately. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>> great news! >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> --- On Sat, 1/8/11, David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> >>>> Subject: Re: Next steps with WebBeansContext? >>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org >>>> Date: Saturday, January 8, 2011, 1:24 AM >>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:35 PM, David >>>> Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Dec 31, 2010, at 1:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Some of these ideas are implemented in the patch >>>> attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-511 >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 31, 2010, at 12:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I looked at the WebBeansContext recently and >>>> was a little surprised at what it does and doesn't do. I >>>> wonder if what I want it to do is what David Blevins was >>>> thinking of as "next steps". >>>>> >>>>> You pretty much got it. The changes are a good next >>>> step. We still have a ways to go as in OpenWebBeans proper >>>> (using the DefaultSingletonService) we still get most our >>>> hits through the static access to ServiceLoader. >>>>> >>>>> 68639 org.apache.webbeans.corespi.ServiceLoader >>>>> 34129 org.apache.webbeans.util.AnnotationUtil >>>>> 6063 org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil >>>>> 2170 org.apache.webbeans.test.TestContext >>>>> 1832 org.apache.webbeans.component.AbstractOwbBean >>>>> 1464 >>>> org.apache.webbeans.intercept.WebBeansInterceptorConfig >>>>> 1402 >>>> org.apache.webbeans.inject.impl.InjectionPointFactory >>>>> 1170 >>>> org.apache.webbeans.decorator.WebBeansDecoratorConfig >>>> >>>> Nice, your last change got us down another 200 or so static >>>> sync calls: >>>> >>>> OWB-503 status: 565 code uses >>>> Total of 94975 static synchronized accesses and >>>> 95398 hashed calls >>>> in 340 tests >>>> Average of 279 static synchronized accesses and 280 >>>> hashed calls per test >>>> >>>> The hashed calls count is no longer accurate as I haven't >>>> updated my >>>> tracking hooks to count the new services map, but the >>>> static >>>> synchronized is still good. >>>> >>>> Here are the next top 10: >>>> >>>> 65558 org.apache.webbeans.context.ContextFactory >>>> 7976 org.apache.webbeans.util.WebBeansUtil >>>> 2420 >>>> org.apache.webbeans.intercept.WebBeansInterceptorConfig >>>> 2288 org.apache.webbeans.config.DefinitionUtil >>>> 2178 org.apache.webbeans.test.TestContext >>>> 1833 org.apache.webbeans.component.AbstractOwbBean >>>> 1622 org.apache.webbeans.inject.impl.InjectionPointFactory >>>> 1254 org.apache.webbeans.event.EventUtil >>>> 1168 org.apache.webbeans.decorator.WebBeansDecoratorConfig >>>> 940 org.apache.webbeans.deployment.StereoTypeModel >>>> >>>> Just de-static'd the ContextFactory, and now we're down >>>> another 200~ per test >>>> >>>> OWB-503 status: 615 code uses >>>> Total of 28894 static synchronized accesses and >>>> 29317 hashed calls >>>> in 340 tests >>>> Average of 84 static synchronized accesses and 86 >>>> hashed calls per test >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
