Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps?
Joe On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1 > specification > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OWB-603 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603 > Project: OpenWebBeans > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Interceptor and Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.1.0 > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Assignee: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > > This affects Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives: > > The CDI-1.0 spec defines that Interceptors, Decorators and Alternatives must > only count for beans of the very the Bean Archive (BDA = the jar file) they > are defined in (via beans.xml). OWB currently ignores this (there is also no > TCK for it) because this behaviour is utterly broken. > The CDI-1.1 (JSR-346) EG is working on improving this: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > This is work in progress, but we should stay close to the new mechanism > because it's better than what we currently have. > > As a first step, we shall remove our DeploymentException when the same > Interceptor gets enabled in more than 1 beans.xml files on the classpath. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > >
