Hi, Ok, I will stay tuned. In the mid time, I can work to release OpenEJB/TomEE.
Jean-Louis 2012/7/17 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > Hi Jean-Louis! > > There is always work to do! :) > > I try to quickly fix a few last bugs and then we head to 1.1.5. After that > there will be a lot to work on again. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:44 AM > > Subject: Re: new logger api? > > > >T hanks Romain. > > If there is another area where I can dig into, that'd be a pleasure. > > > > JLouis > > > > 2012/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > >> pushed it > >> > >> Thks JL! > >> > >> - Romain > >> > >> > >> 2012/7/16 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > Cool, thx for reviewing so quickly. > >> > Jean louis > >> > Le 16 juil. 2012 20:16, "Mark Struberg" > > <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > >> > > >> > > patch looks fine! > >> > > > >> > > LieGrue, > >> > > strub > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > > Cc: > >> > > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM > >> > > > Subject: Re: new logger api? > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi, > >> > > > > >> > > > hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade > > which > >> could > >> > be > >> > > > split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly > > fine :) > >> > > > > >> > > > - Romain > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > 2012/7/16 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > > > >> > > >> Hi! > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks folks! > >> > > >> Will review it this afternoon. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> LieGrue, > >> > > >> strub > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > <jeano...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >> > > >> > Cc: > >> > > >> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM > >> > > >> > Subject: Re: new logger api? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi devs, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to > > change the Logger > >> > API > >> > > > over > >> > > >> > the project. > >> > > >> > It now contains a factory with a default > > implementation based on > >> > JUL. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > If someone can review it, that'd be great > > cause a lot of file > >> > > > changed so > >> > > >> > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Hope it help, > >> > > >> > Jean-Louis > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> mainly what was done in the patch of > >> > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 > > (maybe a bit too > >> > > > much > >> > > >> but > >> > > >> >> was > >> > > >> >> done ;)) > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> - Romain > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> 2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > <jeano...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > I guess a new thread must be opened with > > [VOTE]. > >> > > >> >> > Anyway, if we wanna support other > > logging API, may be we > >> > > > could just > >> > > >> >> review > >> > > >> >> > the factory. > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > Thoughts? > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > JLouis > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > I think questions are: > >> > > >> >> > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? > > --> JUL > >> > > >> >> > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow > > to use other logging > >> > > > API? (add > >> > > >> > or > >> > > >> >> > reuse > >> > > >> >> > > if we go for slf4j for instance) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > - Romain > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a > > volunteer - txs romain > >> > > > :D > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > Nah, serious. We should do a > > VOTE about whether to > >> > > > remove > >> > > >> > the > >> > > >> >> > > > WebBeansLogger or not. > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > LieGrue, > >> > > >> >> > > > strub > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >> > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > >> > > > <jeano...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > > To: > > dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >> > > >> >> > > > > Cc: > >> > > >> >> > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, > > 2012 10:46 AM > >> > > >> >> > > > > Subject: Re: new logger > > api? > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Mark, > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > That be a good starting > > point for me to > >> > > > submit a patch > >> > > >> > if you > >> > > >> >> agree. > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > Jean-Louis > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain > > Manni-Bucau > >> > > >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Or friends ;) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Le 25 juin 2012 > > 08:26, "Jean-Louis > >> > > >> > MONTEIRO" > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > <jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit > >> > > >> >> > > > >> : > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > You still have > > nights ;-) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Was a joke, > > sorry. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > JLouis > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > 2012/6/25 Mark > > Struberg > >> > > >> > <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > gimme a > > few days plz, > >> > > > currently holding > >> > > >> > workshops the next 2 > >> > > >> >> > > > > days. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > LieGrue, > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > strub > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > ----- > > Original Message ----- > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > From: > > Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > >> > > >> > <jeano...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > To: > >> > > > dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Cc: > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Sent: > > Monday, June 25, > >> > > > 2012 8:15 AM > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > Subject: Re: new logger > >> > > > api? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > Yes, > > that will make > >> > > > things simpler > >> > > >> > to integrate ;-) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > JLouis > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain > >> > > > Manni-Bucau > >> > > >> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > any other opinion? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > do we move to JULI > >> > > > directly? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > - Romain > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > 2012/6/11 Romain > >> > > > Manni-Bucau > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> no: > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> private void > >> > > > wblLog(Level > >> > > >> > level, String > >> > > >> >> > > > > messageKey) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> { > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> if > >> > > >> > (logger.isLoggable(level)) > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> { > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > logger.logp(level, caller.getName(), > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(), > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > messageKey); > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> } > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> } > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> well if we move > >> > > > to natve > >> > > >> > JUL we'll need to > >> > > >> >> > > > > keep a factory to > >> > > >> >> > > > >> allow > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> subclasses to > >> > > > switch of > >> > > >> > implementation as cxf > >> > > >> >> > > > > does. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> - Romain > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> 2012/6/11 Mark > >> > > > Struberg > >> > > >> > <strub...@yahoo.de> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> +1 > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> The > >> > > > getStackTrace > >> > > >> > only hits us if we throw an > >> > > >> >> > > > > Exception, right? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > The > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> problem is > >> > > > that due > >> > > >> > to the additional wrapper > >> > > >> >> > > > > handler we always > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > have > > a > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > > 'mismatch' in > >> > > >> > the StackTrace... > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> I'm > >> > > > tempted to > >> > > >> > move to native jul > >> > > >> >> > > > > anyway... > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> LieGrue, > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> strub > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> ----- > >> > > > Original > >> > > >> > Message ----- > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > From: > >> > > > Romain > >> > > >> > Manni-Bucau > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > To: > >> > > >> > dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > Cc: > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > Sent: > >> > > > Monday, > >> > > >> > June 11, 2012 1:28 PM > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > Subject: new > >> > > >> > logger api? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > Hi, > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > just > >> > > > created > >> > > >> >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > any > >> > > > thought > >> > > >> > about it? > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > the > >> > > > goal is > >> > > >> > mainly to allow to use > >> > > >> >> > > > > something else than JUL. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > The > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > proposed > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > patch > >> > > > uses a > >> > > >> > system property but it can > >> > > >> >> > > > > be something else. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > The > >> > > > other topic > >> > > >> > of this jira is the usage > >> > > >> >> > > > > of getStackTrace() > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > in > > the > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > JUL > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > implementation > >> > > >> > which is too costly IMO. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > - > >> > > > Romain > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
