Hi, does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1? Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in?
I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0? Not sure it needs a 2.0, but maybe a real jump in versions would be great. Thoughts? 2012/11/25 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > good idea, I'll go update trunk. > > Please note that this does _not_ change anything for the 1.1.x branch! > > I'll do all this heavy lifting purely in trunk (1.2.x) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM > > Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > > > > +1 > > > > Will we also target java 1.6 ? > > > > 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > > > >> +1 > >> > >> All can be done independently now normally > >> Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> > > a écrit : > >> > >> > I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like > >> > > >> > > >> > //X TODO this MUST NOT be public! > >> > public static > > ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>> > >> > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods = > >> > new > > ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>(); > >> > > >> > > >> > Such code is pure PITA! > >> > > >> > > >> > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go > > for > >> > CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction > > atm > >> and > >> > we really need to cleanup tons of things! > >> > > >> > LieGrue, > >> > strub > >> > > >> > > > -- Jean-Louis
