both commits are pure bugfixes and perfectly fine to be ported back to 1.1.7 imo. Please commit them Gurkan
LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> >To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> >Cc: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:25 PM >Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? > > >r1409751, r1409721 not ported to 1.1.x branch. Mark, are you able to port >this? > > > > >________________________________ > Kimden: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> >Kopya: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 14:18 Salı >Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? > >think only 1409721 was not ported, no? > >*Romain Manni-Bucau* >*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* >*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > >2012/11/27 Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> > >> Hi Mark >> >> Yeah I get your point! I do not mean that we have to port module changes >> to 1.1.x branch. I just want to have other fixes that I mentioned in >> previous email in 1.1.x branch. If we will not commit these fix to branch, >> these fixes had already been committed to the 1.2.0 TRUNK, we can release >> 1.2.0.M1 before changing lots of the things in TRUNK. For Siwpas, these >> fixes are very important. >> >> >> Gurkan >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> Kimden: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> Kime: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> >> Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 13:51 Salı >> Konu: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? >> >> Hi Gurkan! >> >> I think we should _not_ port back all changes we did on trunk. That would >> make the maintenance branch worthless. >> I would e.g. not port back the SPI and module changes because that means >> it's not a drop-in replacement anymore. I have not looked at the >> webbeans-cluster stuff right now. If this is not needed for most users >> which do not use fail-over then I can imagine that it might be ok for 1.1.7 >> as well. It should at least be drop in for most of our users. >> >> >> Before heading to release 1.2.0 I would like to fix our Security stuff >> with commons-privilizer. >> >> >> There are for sure a few things we need to fix in both branches. E.g. >> making the Producers stateless and remove the CreationalContext from them. >> >> >> How do we handle this in JIRA? >> I propose to create a bug report for 1.2.0 and then create a clone for >> 1.1.7 just for tracking commits and to be able to get a clean release >> report. wdyt? >> >> Please tell us your preferences for doing a 1.2.0 release. >> So far we are still on CDI-1.0, releasing 1.2.0 with CDI-1.0 and later >> moving to 1.1 sounds a bit weird imo. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> >> > To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> >> > Cc: >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:19 AM >> > Subject: Re: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? >> > >> > AFAIK some fix in trunk were not ported to 1.1.7 branch. Before >> releasing, we >> > must fix these bugs. >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > Kimden: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> > Kime: openwebbeans-dev <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org> >> > Gönderildiği Tarih: 27 Kasım 2012 0:52 Salı >> > Konu: Thoughts on OWB 1.1.7 ? >> > >> > What's the approximate timeline on 1.1.7 ? >> > >> > >> > -David >> > >> > > > > >