Ok Works for me
Thks Le 10 mai 2013 10:12, "Arne Limburg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > I think in CDI 1.0 there is a TCK test that requires us to fail. In CDI > 1.1 we have the @TransientReference for this scenarios. > > > Cheers, > Arne > > Am 10.05.13 10:05 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter > <[email protected]>: > > >Hi > > > >Due to a regression in tomee i looked thus case we dont handle anymore but > >not sure it is normal with cdi-140: > > > >- take a producer which produces sthg dependent not passivation capable > >- inject it in a passivationcapable bean through a constructor > > > >ATM we fail but it should be more or less doable as it should through > >setters since the bean can convert it (get a serializable attribute for > >instance) > >I know it is hard to find and woyld need bytecode analyzis but i find it a > >strong limitation (+potential regression) > > > >Wdyt > >
