Hi David, Do I read the log correctly and SimpleServlet is @Dependent? Is SimpleServlet injected into a passivation-capable bean? If not, I agree with you that this is a bug.
Cheers, Arne Am 10.05.13 22:55 schrieb "David Blevins" unter <[email protected]>: >Since the upgrade to 1.2.0 in we have a test failure. There's a servlet >with constructor injection like so: > > > @Inject > public SimpleServlet(Car car) { > this.car = car; > } > >And Car looks like so: > > public class Car { > private final String make = "Lexus", model = "IS 350"; > private final int year = 2011; > > public String drive(String name) { > return name + " is on the wheel of a " + year + " " + make + >" " + model; > } > } > >All deploys fine and everything is injected as expected. Now the >problem. If you introduce a producer, it fails saying Car is not >passivation capable as required by the SimpleServlet injection point. > > public class Car { > private final String make = "Lexus", model = "IS 350"; > private final int year = 2011; > > public Car(String ignore) { > } > > public String drive(String name) { > return name + " is on the wheel of a " + year + " " + make + >" " + model; > } > } > > public class Foo { > > @Produces @Default > public Car car() { > return new Car("foo"); > } > } > > >javax.enterprise.inject.IllegalProductException: A producer method or >field of scope @Dependent returns an unserializable object for injection >into an injection point Constructor Injection Point, constructor name : >org.apache.openejb.arquillian.tests.cdi.constructor.SimpleServlet, Bean >Owner : [SimpleServlet, Name:null, WebBeans Type:DEPENDENT, API >Types:[java.io.Serializable,java.lang.Object,javax.servlet.ServletConfig,o >rg.apache.openejb.arquillian.tests.cdi.constructor.SimpleServlet,javax.ser >vlet.http.HttpServlet,javax.servlet.Servlet,javax.servlet.GenericServlet], > >Qualifiers:[javax.enterprise.inject.Any,javax.enterprise.inject.Default]] >that requires a passivation capable dependency > at >org.apache.webbeans.inject.AbstractInjectable.inject(AbstractInjectable.ja >va:108) > at >org.apache.webbeans.inject.InjectableConstructor.doInjection(InjectableCon >structor.java:80) > at >org.apache.webbeans.portable.InjectionTargetImpl.newInstance(InjectionTarg >etImpl.java:253) > at >org.apache.webbeans.portable.InjectionTargetImpl.produce(InjectionTargetIm >pl.java:180) > at >org.apache.webbeans.component.AbstractOwbBean.create(AbstractOwbBean.java: >119) > >There's debate as if the test is bad or if the check is incorrect. Seems >like an OWB bug to me. > >Thoughts? > > >-David >
