Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a few
days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing
java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like to
find the issue with passivation checking.
-David
On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
>> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark
>> Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> You can build it from trunk
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arne
>>
>> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
>> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>>> I would try it with my current app.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
>>>
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>>>
>>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
>>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>>>
>>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
>> passing
>>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>>> compat
>>>> package.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>>> other
>>>> minor things.
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>
>>>>> To: "u...@openwebbeans.apache.org"
>> <u...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>>>
>>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Arne
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>>>>> <hwellmann...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public void
>> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>>>>>> annotatedType)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>>> p
>>>>>> e);
>>>>>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Harald
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
