Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a few days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like to find the issue with passivation checking. -David On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> >> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <dev@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark >> Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> Cc: >> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33 >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 >> >> Hi Thomas, >> >> You can build it from trunk >> >> >> Regards, >> Arne >> >> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter >> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere? >>> I would try it with my current app. >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >>> >>>> Hi folks! >>>> >>>> I'll reroll the release this evening. >>>> >>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release >>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it. >>>> >>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without >> passing >>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a >>>> compat >>>> package. >>>> >>>> >>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few >>>> other >>>> minor things. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> >>>>> To: "u...@openwebbeans.apache.org" >> <u...@openwebbeans.apache.org> >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32 >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one. >>>>> >>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the >> release. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Arne >>>>> >>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter >>>>> <hwellmann...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> -1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding >>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8. >>>>>> >>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious: >>>>>> >>>>>> public void >> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?> >>>>>> annotatedType) >>>>>> { >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy >>>> p >>>>>> e); >>>>>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType); >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Harald >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >