-1

>From my (admittedly limited) perspective, in 1.2.4 you could use the
jetty:run target to run our samples, and in 1.2.5 you can't due to the
changes in OWB-953, which means we have regressed "file:/" urls.  I'll be
the first to admit that may not be a pervasive use case.


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Continue and here is my +1 then.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2014-05-25 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1 since all other binaries are ok and this is pluggable (worse case)
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-25 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> >
> > > hmm oki looked at it once again and it seems this has been broken since
> > > quite some time really.
> > > So it's not a recent regression since 1.2.4 but broken since quite some
> > > time.
> > >
> > > I'd say we can continue the VOTE? wdym?
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:33, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>  On , Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > > >>  > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
> > > >>  WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> > > >>  That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship
> > > > thisbinary.
> > > >>
> > > >>  The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
> > > >>
> > > >>  txs and LieGrue,
> > > >>  strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>   On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > > >
> > > >>  wrote:
> > > >>>   >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether
> we
> > > > can
> > > >>  defer this
> > > >>>   to 1.2.6...
> > > >>>   Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it
> > > > run.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   LieGrue,
> > > >>>   strub
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>    On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
> > > >>  <bergm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>   wrote:
> > > >>>>    > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a
> > > > patch
> > > >>  that
> > > >>>   resolves the
> > > >>>>    issue in my testing.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>    On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
> > > >>  <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > > >>>   wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     Hi Joe!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
> > > >>  tomorrow and
> > > >>>   will
> > > >>>>>     abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     txs and LieGrue,
> > > >>>>>     strub
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>     > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
> > > >>>>    <bergm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>     wrote:
> > > >>>>>     > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I
> > > > can
> > > >>  tell
> > > >>>   it
> > > >>>>    appears
> > > >>>>>     to
> > > >>>>>     > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated
> > > > (at
> > > >>  least
> > > >>>   on my
> > > >>>>>     > machine).
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery &
> > > > CdiArchive
> > > >>  are
> > > >>>>    showing URLs
> > > >>>>>     > for my classes directory that look like:
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>  file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what
> > > > appears
> > > >>  to be
> > > >>>   a
> > > >>>>>     correct
> > > >>>>>     > String
> > > >>>>
> > > >>  "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
> > > >>>>>     > from
> > > >>>>>     > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:"
> > > > again
> > > >>  here
> > > >>>   on
> > > >>>>    line 156:
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     >                     //X TODO check!
> > > >>>>>     >                     addPath = "file:" + url +
> > > >>>>>     > "META-INF/beans.xml";
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is
> > > > added
> > > >>  to
> > > >>>   the
> > > >>>>    list
> > > >>>>>     of
> > > >>>>>     > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this
> > > > is a
> > > >>  small
> > > >>>>>     > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> > > >>>>>     > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>     >>  i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g.
> > > > [1]
> > > >>  and
> > > >>>   [2])
> > > >>>>    and all
> > > >>>>>     > tests
> > > >>>>>     >>  look fine.
> > > >>>>>     >>  -> +1
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>  regards,
> > > >>>>>     >>  gerhard
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>  [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
> > > >>>>>     >>  [2]
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>  2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
> > > >>>>    <bergm...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >>  > I set up my build environment on a new
> > > > machine, so
> > > >>  its
> > > >>>>    possible
> > > >>>>>     > I'm
> > > >>>>>     >>  > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
> > > >
> > > >>>   successful
> > > >>>>    build from
> > > >>>>>     > the
> > > >>>>>     >>  > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with
> > > > the
> > > >>  guess
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>    sample app
> > > >>>>>     > which is
> > > >>>>>     >>  my
> > > >>>>>     >>  > normal go-to for quick testing.
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > It looks like an EL or bean discovery
> > > > problem, as
> > > >>>   loginBean
> > > >>>>    isn't
> > > >>>>>     > being
> > > >>>>>     >>  > found.  I'll do a bit more digging but
> > > > was
> > > >>  curious
> > > >>>   if
> > > >>>>    anyone had
> > > >>>>>     > luck
> > > >>>>>     >>  with
> > > >>>>>     >>  > the samples or the guess sample app in
> > > > particular.
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David
> > > > Blevins
> > > >>>>>     > <david.blev...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >wrote:
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > +1
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > --
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > David Blevins
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark
> > > > Struberg
> > > >>>>>     > <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on
> > > > releasing
> > > >>
> > > >>>   Apache
> > > >>>>>     > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > This is a maintenance release of
> > > > the
> > > >>>   owb_1.2.x
> > > >>>>    branch and
> > > >>>>>     > targets the
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > CDI-1.0 specification.
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > The ReleaseNotes are available
> > > > online:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > SVN source tag:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>
> > > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > Source Release:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > Binary release:
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > Here is my +1
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > LieGrue,
> > > >>>>>     >>  > > > strub
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  > >
> > > >>>>>     >>  >
> > > >>>>>     >>
> > > >>>>>     >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Reply via email to