I’ve created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6546
and committed a copy of the 1.1 api.

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec

Next step is to svn cp trunk to a feature branch.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 17.08.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> 
> Think we have enough G guys to avoid the cp but no issues bringing it in
> owb for now.
> Le 17 août 2015 03:18, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> The question now is whether we should svn cp the geronimo-jcdi-1.1 package
>> back to owb and maintain it here until it is reasonably stable (and then
>> svn mv it back to geronimo)?
>> Or should we keep it there and just create a new geronimo-jcdi-2.0 package
>> in geronimo-specs?
>> 
>> Both is technically the same as we can svn cp back and forth without
>> loosing any history.
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 17.08.2015 um 11:04 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> +2 lol
>>> 
>>> Le lun. 17 août 2015 à 10:59, Arne Limburg <
>> [email protected]>
>>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> I hope, I¹ll find some time to help
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Am 11.08.15 15:05 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter
>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>> 
>>>>> Cant guarantee to help a lot now but +1. Would be nice to not identify
>>>>> spec
>>>>> issues too late.
>>>>> Le 11 août 2015 05:31, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]>
>> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2015-08-11 13:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What about starting with implementing CDI-2.0?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The spec is of course not finished but I¹d like to be a bit more
>>>>>> bleeding
>>>>>>> edge than last time ;)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I¹ll start with copying over the geronimo-jcdi spec packages and
>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>> feature branch in our SVN.
>>>>>>> If you have some changes then feel free to ship some patches!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to