Not sure Mark.
If you have much projects openend in your IDE, it's really annoying if they
are not sorted because of a missing prefix...

+1 Romain

2015-10-27 9:33 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> IMO it makes the build more readable and human friendly. That said why not
> just voting. Dont think we need to spend weeks on this topic.
> Le 27 oct. 2015 09:29, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
> > -1 for having <name> in poms at all. In practice it makes finding the
> > right submodule just too hard if you don’t know the project. And if you
> do
> > then you don’t need it anyway.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 26.10.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > Guess it is subjective enough to not do a long thread on this. We just
> > need
> > > to avoid to change them each week ;).
> > > Le 26 oct. 2015 20:52, "Thomas Andraschko" <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > >> Yep, you'r right but it still looks good in OWB ->
> > >> http://s2.postimg.org/a2b8x7e2x/asd.png
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2015-10-26 20:25 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >:
> > >>
> > >>> Any separator works but it is nice to not just keep everything
> inlined
> > >>> without hierarchy marker for multi module projects.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2015-10-26 20:20 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> > >>>> :
> > >>>
> > >>>> oh, i see.
> > >>>> Doesn't matter for me, for me it's usual without "::" :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2015-10-26 20:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> TomEE, Sirona, BatchEE, JCS, Johnzon, XBean to cite a few
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2015-10-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> :
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> yep, it's about mvn <name> :)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +0
> > >>>>>> Where is this pattern used?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2015-10-26 19:41 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> If you speak about mvn <name> +1.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> BTW I like <project> [:: <module>]* pattern:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans
> > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: Core
> > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: Web
> > >>>>>>> Apache OpenWebBeans :: JSF 2.2
> > >>>>>>> ...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2015-10-26 19:36 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> WDYT about unify the project names in the poms?
> > >>>>>>>> DeltaSpike and MyFaces always prepends "Apache" and the project
> > >>>> name.
> > >>>>>>>> e.g.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core API
> > >>>>>>>> Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core Impl
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Apache DeltaSpike Parent
> > >>>>>>>> Apache DeltaSpike Modules
> > >>>>>>>> ...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> In OWB it's:
> > >>>>>>>> OpenWebBeans Core
> > >>>>>>>> Tomcat 7 Plugin
> > >>>>>>>> EL 2.2 Plugin
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It's just a little bit annoying in the IDE...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to