OWB is a non-issue :) Hope that CXF will release soon too. LieGrue, strub
> On Sunday, 13 November 2016, 21:23, Romain Manni-Bucau > <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > ATM we depend on 2 snapshots: > > - OWB > - CXF > > I'm pretty sure we can solve the first one pretty easily and CXF should > release next month. I'd like to get a release out a bit before Xmas if we > can. To make that possible I'll get in touch with CXF to ensure they > don't > release too late for us but we also need to do our own homeworks and that's > where I'd like your feedback before going outside our own community: > > 1. release OWB > 2. check all the legal stuff (to avoid some round trips and N votes) - I > did a first pass but help if more than welcomed on that topic > 3. upgrade CXF and OWB and ensure we still work > 4. optional but good - get some reviews of current code > > Side note: we can also speak about owning the CXF CDI extension and not > reuse CXF one which would avoid us to depend on CXF snapshot (last release > got some bugs only in this part which is 2-3 classes). That said I like > reusing as much as possible of CXF and own as few as possible of the stack. > > Wdyt? Does it sounds feasible? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >
