Can one of you list the part of the spec stating it for this thread to be self contained please?
Who takes the fix? Can have a look end of next week I guess if it helps. Le 22 juil. 2017 23:37, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > John is right. interceptor and Decorator are bean defining annotations. > > John, can you plz file a ticket! > > Txs and LieGrue, > Strub > > > Am 21.07.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Conflicts with annotated part i think. Priority doesnt enable a bean by > > itself. > > > > Le 21 juil. 2017 21:31, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit > : > > > >> The interceptor is intended to be enabled just because of the @Priority > >> annotation. Nothing else should be required. Please review 9.4 of the > >> spec http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html# > enabled_interceptors > >> > >> John > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Misses @Dependent yes. > >>> > >>> Le 21 juil. 2017 19:35, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a > écrit > >> : > >>> > >>> I have an interceptor defined as: > >>> > >>> @Interceptor > >>> @LoggedIn > >>> @Priority(Interceptor.Priority.APPLICATION + 100) > >>> public class LoggedInInterceptor { > >>> > >>> and a beans.xml with > >>> > >>> <beans version="1.1" bean-discovery-mode="annotated"/> > >>> > >>> This interceptor isn't being discovered. It is discovered when > beans.xml > >>> is an empty file. This same interceptor is discovered on OWB 1.7, but > >> not > >>> in 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >> > >
