Looks good to me, ship it +1 Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine at this point.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our > CDI-2.0 implementation. > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) > and a few Instance and Event fixes. > > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE > integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8. > > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed: > > Bug > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by > default > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for > extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode > if not decorated with @Dependent > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI > Extension Observers > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind > CDI.current() > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be > automatically enabled > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of > Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct > blow up with a NPE > Task > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0 > > > The staging repo can be found here: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/ > > The source release is under > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/ > > > Please VOTE > > [+1] go for it! > [+0] meh, don't care > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper} > > The VOTE is open for 72h > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > >
