Didn't we have a test for generic types already? E.g. ProcessAnnotatedType<Poodle> vs ProcessAnnotatedType<Sheep> And one type layer down ProcessAnnotatedType<Housingl<Poodle>> vs ProcessAnnotatedType<Housing<Sheep>>
If we don't have this kind of test yet then we should add one. LieGrue, strub > Am 15.10.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Thomas Andraschko > <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > ok... i totally forgot about generic lifecycle events... > > I will try to just optimize the current NotificationManager, without adding > a breaking cache :D > > Am Fr., 12. Okt. 2018 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > >> ok, will provide a better patch on monday! >> >> Am Fr., 12. Okt. 2018 um 16:44 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >>> We can surely clean it up after startup but looks good >>> >>> Le ven. 12 oct. 2018 17:16, Thomas Andraschko < >>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> >>> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as you already may know from the TomEE/BVal mailing list, i'm not happy >>>> with the startup performance since TomEE8. >>>> >>>> TomEE7 OWB startup ~ 4,5seconds >>>> TomEE8 OWB startup ~ 9seconds >>>> >>>> i finally managed to improve the performance on 2 places. >>>> >>>> 1) Filter framework classes in BVal on PAT >>>> Reduces the startup to ~8seconds >>>> >>>> 2) Cache obervers for systemEvents in >>> NotificationManager#resolveObservers >>>> Reduces the starup to ~7 seconds >>>> Patch: >>>> https://gist.github.com/tandraschko/de4c72c22e65aaefe041af5a15d110e3 >>>> >>>> Do you think the patch is ok or could it break something? >>>> I would be happy if mark or romain could improve it :D >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Thomas >>>> >>> >>
