[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Romain Manni-Bucau updated OWB-1293:
------------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: Hi [~gr...@webtide.com],

 

for the API:
{code:java}
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-el_2.2_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
{code})

> Update Jetty integration prior to Jetty-10 release
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OWB-1293
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293
>             Project: OpenWebBeans
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Interceptor and Decorators
>            Reporter: Greg Wilkins
>            Priority: Major
>
> The current jetty integration relies on exposing private jetty APIs so a 
> jetty Decorator can be registered.   This is fragile and requires different 
> APIs for the upcoming jetty-10 release.
> Instead, Jetty is developing a mechanism where a object with a decorator 
> signature can be set as a context attribute and it will be introspected and 
> dynamically registered as a decorator without any API dependencies.
> This is currently being developed in 
> [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3838] and an integration with 
> Weld is at [https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1926] 
> Feedback is sought from the OpenWebBeans team on the approach and then we'd 
> like to collaborate to make a similar integration.
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to